Why the wrong person always wins

From the title itself the author poses a very biased point of view. He criticizes people that he deems to be undeserving of the prize. What he actually does not realize is that there are people who deserve some sort of prize as well. He does bring up a good question though, which is "who actually deserve a prize?" It really depends on what category we bring it up. Just like what he says, even Mussolini and Hitler would deserve a prize at some level... Then it brings me to think that every prize can have its reasons, such as economical and political misusage of prize.